Are search engines a threat to democracy? A few issues that Halavais brings up definitely make us to reflect on the impact of search engines on our collective thought process. Today, we extensively use search engine for information gathering and it is easy to imagine that public opinion could be cleverly manipulated by groups manipulating the search algorithms. This might be done systemically over a period of time to an extent where the democratic system could be influenced or even challenged by a small group of vested interests. The problem is real and we have ample examples in the history (think how Hitler toppled democracy and held on absolute power with threat and propaganda). However, I believe that such concerns are not material for a few critical reasons.
Firstly, search engines are an extension of the technology environment that has enlightened our society in the last decade. People using Internet in general and search engines in particular is inquisitive people with a desire to stay intellectually well-informed. Manipulating search engines might shape some opinions but in the longer term people will recognize these attempts to influence and will discard them in the same way as they pass over propaganda columns. Freedom of speech and expression is an essential element of democracy and Internet provides a perfect platform for people to present their viewpoint. As a result, no attempt to control or influence opinion that can threaten democracy by search engines or other forums will be sustainable.
Secondly, with all its criticisms on ‘aggregating’ or ‘trivializing’ important issues, Internet forums always strive to bring out the truth. It is not the benefit of having a forum but it is our own inquisitive nature and passion for facts that is brought to fruition by the social forums. I agree that the noise levels are sometime annoying but at least there is a way now to voice your opinion and find like minded people who otherwise would be silent or diffident in a public forum.
Finally, on the point of homogenizing content, I still think that the benefits of the online tools far outweigh the pitfalls. It’s true that online interaction promotes homogenizing or aggregation but that is true even for offline collaboration. It’s hard to “design by committee” and there’s often an obstacle to a coherent and unifying thought process when multiple groups are involved and that’s not something particularly specific about how we use Internet as a community.
In summary, I believe there are bigger threats to democracy than search engines. Democracy is not perfect and there are countries with democracy that display a rising gap between haves and have-nots. Poverty, lack of education, regional conflicts, corruption, nepotism are a just a few elements that are an obstacle to the idea of an ideal democratic system. Search engines have the potential to influence naïve populace and even opinionate a large group but in the final analysis such concerns may be overcome by the human intellect which has proven to rise above such attempts of subversion.
Firstly, search engines are an extension of the technology environment that has enlightened our society in the last decade. People using Internet in general and search engines in particular is inquisitive people with a desire to stay intellectually well-informed. Manipulating search engines might shape some opinions but in the longer term people will recognize these attempts to influence and will discard them in the same way as they pass over propaganda columns. Freedom of speech and expression is an essential element of democracy and Internet provides a perfect platform for people to present their viewpoint. As a result, no attempt to control or influence opinion that can threaten democracy by search engines or other forums will be sustainable.
Secondly, with all its criticisms on ‘aggregating’ or ‘trivializing’ important issues, Internet forums always strive to bring out the truth. It is not the benefit of having a forum but it is our own inquisitive nature and passion for facts that is brought to fruition by the social forums. I agree that the noise levels are sometime annoying but at least there is a way now to voice your opinion and find like minded people who otherwise would be silent or diffident in a public forum.
Finally, on the point of homogenizing content, I still think that the benefits of the online tools far outweigh the pitfalls. It’s true that online interaction promotes homogenizing or aggregation but that is true even for offline collaboration. It’s hard to “design by committee” and there’s often an obstacle to a coherent and unifying thought process when multiple groups are involved and that’s not something particularly specific about how we use Internet as a community.
In summary, I believe there are bigger threats to democracy than search engines. Democracy is not perfect and there are countries with democracy that display a rising gap between haves and have-nots. Poverty, lack of education, regional conflicts, corruption, nepotism are a just a few elements that are an obstacle to the idea of an ideal democratic system. Search engines have the potential to influence naïve populace and even opinionate a large group but in the final analysis such concerns may be overcome by the human intellect which has proven to rise above such attempts of subversion.
No comments:
Post a Comment